Monday, January 26, 2009

Money Monday

The News

Car inventories are increasing

Obama will direct federal regulators on Monday to move swiftly on an application by California and 13 other states to set strict automobile emission and fuel efficiency standards.

Emissions Are Increasing

California will rise again

To the surprise of progressives and anger of the GOP, leading Dems support investigating the Bush administration's crimes.

Obama is concerned that the YouTube generation that elected him is tired?



70,000 more jobs lost

Pfizer to buy rival for $68B
VIENNA: The United Nations' crime and drug watchdog has indications that money made in illicit drug trade has been used to keep banks afloat in the global financial crisis, its head was quoted as saying on Sunday.

"In many instances, drug money is currently the only liquid investment capital," Costa was quoted as saying by Profil. "In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system's main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor."
http://www.iht.com/articles/reuters/2009/01/25/europe/OUKWD-UK-FINANCIAL-UN-DRUGS.php
Anyone remember this?



Dems say bank bailout may increase
 "Lending at many of the nation's largest banks fell in recent months, even after they received $148 billion in taxpayer capital that was intended to help the economy by making loans more readily available." (Wall Street Journal, 1/26)

"Some increased investment (may be required). Change has to happen in terms of what is done, what the transparency of it is, what the accountability of it is. Only then would we be able to pass any additional funding." (Nancy Pelosi)
What does nationalizing banks mean, that the private banks that control the Federal Reserve will have even more control? Is the key real oversight, not a promise of oversight?

Pelosi was asked "whether the government should not just nationalize the banks outright.
"Well, whatever you want to call it... if we are going to put money into the banks, we certainly want equity for the American people" (Nancy Pelosi)

The New York Times(1/26, A1, Sanger) adds that "privately, most members of the Obama economic team concede that the rapid deterioration of the country's biggest banks, notably Bank of America and Citigroup, is bound to require far larger investments of taxpayer money, atop the more than $300 billion of taxpayer money already poured into those two financial institutions and hundreds of others."
The Washington Post(1/26, A1, Irwin, Appelbaum) reports, "Congress is moving to create strong new oversight of the financial sector that would likely give the Federal Reserve authority to examine the workings of a wide range of companies in an attempt to address one of the key failures that led to the financial crisis." However, "the initiative, which could be finalized in the House by spring, is raising concerns about whether it would muddy the Fed's traditional mission and concentrate too much power in a single federal body."



Woodrow Wilson created the current central banking system of the United States by signing the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913.  The Act created a Board of Governors to oversee twelve private Federal Reserve Banks charged with controlling the cash flow in the United States and established a Federal Open Market Committee to oversee the buying and selling of government securities. 
"A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men ... [W]e have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men." (Woodrow Wilson)

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." (Woodrow Wilson)
The Obama administration is nominating Jane Holl Lute as Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security. Jane Lute was an official of the Association of the U.S. Army, a defense lobbying group.  Her husband Douglas Lute is helping to coordinate the Bush public relations blitz that is expected to paint the Iraq "surge" report by General David Petraeus in a favorable light.


Hope and change has come to Google Maps.


'The group of vigilante men came to report that while they were on patrol they saw some hoodlums attempting to rob a car. They pursued them.

'However one of them escaped while the other turned into a goat,'  Kwara state police spokesman Tunde Mohammed said.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1127012/Police-arrest-goat-accused-armed-robbery.html
Reactions
I want to teach my four year old the Pledge of Allegiance, and rediscover the meaning along the way (A Reader, Kyne)


Your Job:
It's Money Monday. Spend some time today understanding money, how it's created, the role of banks, of the Federal Reserve and the resulting inevitability of inflation.

There are several good mini-documentaries that you can find on YouTube, including this one. Essentially money is debt, debt is money, we require debt to grow and yet debt is our undoing.

Is our monetary policy working? Credit ;) or blame belongs with the The Federal Reserve but yet we could be seeing the Federal Reserve with more power.

This financial crisis began with money made cheap by the Federal Reserve and escalated with the convoluted mess of unregulated derivatives tied to real estate: Credit Default Swaps. The same financial institutions that created the out-of-control derivatives, whose total value is unknown and can only be estimated, but is estimated to be multiple times larger than the stock market, are the financial institutions getting the bank bailouts.

Though banks are sitting on their cash and acquiring other banks. Companies still cannot get loans, homes are foreclosing, the public is in a panic. People are losing their jobs and people not losing their jobs aren't spending money at their local restaurants or businesses.

What can we do? What should we do?

Obama wants to create jobs improving our infrastructure, health and education. The so-called fiscal conservatives didn't balk at financing the alleged improvement, health and infrastructure of Iraq. They didn't stop the bank bailouts, so is the real reason they oppose Obama's stimulus program because this money doesn't go directly to the big businesses they cater to?

Monetary policy is not an easy subject. I can't solve it in the Comments section, but today we can all learn about it, discuss it, make suggestions for the future or more pragmatically, make suggestions for the present. Jobs are disappearing, so where can one find or create work? Where are the opportunities? We should save our money to prepare for tough times but if no one spends any money, than the tough times get worse. 

Suggestions?

10 comments:

  1. Just a quick observation to share:
    We're watching you, Mr. President can be found at
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_pl228

    ReplyDelete
  2. Money Monday? Sounds like they're calling it Bloody Monday as far as the job market is going. Makes one a bit nervous.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I understand a company needs to try to keep profits up, expenses down and find new ways to make money, but the events with Pfizer just seem a little ironic to me. They're going to buy their competitor Wyeth for $68 Billion and is planning about 26,000 new job cuts and will close five manufacturing plants. Does this bother anyone else?

    ReplyDelete
  4. it sure does and makes no sense to be in a business sense...and the other thing is on these drug companies..it is all profit. I have to get some meds from Canada, where the cost is about half of what I pay here, and it's the same drug., and in my opinion still high in price..for a drug that has been around a while

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think that allowing states to set their own auto emissions and efficiency standards will be a good thing. I think the states can better determine their needs and pass legislation more quickly. However I think states should join forces, probably by region to set regional standards. It will force the auto industry to evolve or go extinct. That is a hard fact of doing business.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Re: Pfizer is basically putting competition out of business and consolidating -- It's hard for me to figure out how we could regulate companies so that they value things other than just short-term profitability without imposing too much on business. (ie, regulations to communism at the extreme end) . In the old days I think there was more honor among businesses but now it's "just business", so what can be done? Regulations for some areas, but I don't know how you could have regulated this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree re: emissions John, however I can also see the argument that, say the pollution from New Jersey, affects Pennsylvania.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am very excited about President Obama's push to make the US independent of foreign oil. I have felt strongly about this for probably 30 years shortly after the fuel shortages of the 70's when I started realizing the issue. I think this is doable. I think this is a necessity. Most people see this in the light of the environment, but it is necessary for national security today.

    Our military, just as the German military of WWII, runs on petroleum. If foreign petroleum producers really united they could shut our country and our military down. You've seen the numbers on petroleum usage and production. Here is a link http://www.eia.doe.gov/basics/quickoil.html so I won't get into that. As we all know the U.S. is at war, however they are not what I might term intense warfare requiring our militaries to face other very capable militaries requiring the use of very large amounts of fuel for tanks, personnel carriers, supply vehicles, ships and planes. This is not to diminish the wars currently underway.

    So in the midst of the world heading toward a recession who made money? The oil industry of course. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/02/high_oil.html http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/01/business/01cnd-exxon.html?em&ex=1202101200&en=575e77c5fd8688b0&ei=5087%0A Maybe they could finance the US bailout.

    I don't suppose they oppose renewable energy, do you?.... I don't have any facts on this, but I recall comments many years ago that the oil industry was buying up the patents on renewable energy. From a business standpoint that makes sense because you make money on producing energy. Right now you make your biggest profit on cheap petroleum. So you buy the patents to do R&D for creating energy for the future and/or keep the competition from creating alternative energy. We live in a world of greed. Businesses aren't necessarily, in fact probably seldom are looking for the best interest of the United States or the citizens of the U.S.. They're looking to line their pocket...what many call the American way. I have my own business and work for another business. I understand the need to make a profit, but it seems there are ethical considerations here as well.

    I think this is where a large portion of our bailout money should go. I hate the fact that we're "throwing good money after bad". We're giving money to businesses who have squandered away billions of dollars to keep them from destroying our economy. However I don't want to see our economy collapse. We need new businesses that can run efficiently. We need an evolution of business, but for our own sake we need to pay for it to occur gradually. By doing so some of those dinosaurs will continue to survive, but a new industry, a new economy will grow, even flourish.

    So how else can alternative energy help us and how can this help us now? In the last few weeks around a quarter of a million Americans lost their job from all sorts of industries. These people have skills that can be used to build the infrastructure necessary for producing and delivering these energy sources. This will provide new areas of study. Students will be able to advance in areas to support this industry. There have been numerous production plants around the country that have shut down. These may be capable of being revamped to develop that hardware en-mass. Of course this will all take money. It will take time and energy as well. But I believe that if we go into this with from the point of view that it is a national security issue it can be done quickly.

    I haven't even touched on environmental issues surrounding alternative and renewable energy. This issue is just too big. Interestingly I'm currently watching a show on public television about Oppenheimer and the development of nuclear weapons. Look what we've accomplished in the past (not that I'm promoting the development and use of nuclear weapons here) when we put our minds and energy into it, especially when we felt we had to do it to win a war, to survive. Re-engineering our energy infrastructure must be done. We can do it. Yes we can!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mark, regarding emissions; of course emissions in one state affect another. One reason why I feel regions would join together. Of course it can be argued that one region affects another, one country affects another. Emissions go into the atmosphere and the atmosphere surrounds us all. So in one sense if the emissions policies remained centralized we have more power to force the auto industry to make changes. However I think the smaller regions will pass more stringent restrictions faster than at the national level. I also think there is too much lobby power at the national level, not that this lobbying power won't make it's way to all the states. But I also feel that the individual will become more involved if the legislation is brought down to his/her level.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I seem to be quite verbal today, but I just feel like adding this little bit. I'm watching another interesting show on PBS on Iran. Close your eyes and bring up your perceptions of Iran. Your perceptions are likely skewed by the rhetoric we see in the news. Now watch this show http://www.ricksteves.com/iran/ and see how your perception compares.

    ReplyDelete