Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Attitude Adjustment: Inaugurated

The News:

Barack Hussein Obama was inaugurated as the 44th president of the United States today. Attendance = 2 Million?

Meanwhile, Cheney's Records to Remain Secret
A federal district court judge has ruled that outgoing Vice President Dick Cheney, who leaves office on Tuesday with an approval rating of just 13 percent, will be the sole determining authority on the public release of his vice presidential records.

I've pulled a few quotes from Obama's Inaugural Address:
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake.

Politicians lie, but I'm going to take Obama on his word here. This to me signals that the War on Terror is going to change. Previously it seemed more like a business opportunity and expensive cottage industry than an actual program to reduce terrorism. There's nothing wrong with companies profiting from a war on terror, but that ought to not be at the expense of our laws or essentially, "the terrorists" have won.
"We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you."
He's assuring that he will not be soft on terror, or a terror appeaser as the republicans like to say (though what do you call increasing global terrorism if not terror appeasement, which is what took place during the Bush administration)
"For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and nonbelievers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace."
He's an inclusive guy!
"Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint."

"Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends — hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism — these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility — a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task."

"The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. And those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account — to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day — because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government."

Fiscal conservatism died but we need fiscal pragmatism. Ideologues beware but to me this is smart governance.
"Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations."

Reactions (from my Facebook friends):

"(I am) happy to live in a country where the President is one we elected!!"

"When was the last time America was so happy?"

"(I am) calm and content."

"(I am) wondering where to celebrate."

"(I am) happy to finally be waking up from this long national nightmare."

"(I am) trying to focus on working."

"(I am) optimistic!"

"(I am) joyous, celebratory. Obama! Obama! Obama! "

"(I am) stoked that the tyrant is gone!"

"(I am) glad that our long national nightmare is over."

"(I am) happy to begin the peace and dignity era"

"(I am) inspired:)"


Your Job:
What can you do today to improve the United States? Adjust your attitude, set goals and work hard to achieve them.

Pessimism is easy -- obviously Barack Obama himself cannot change everything that everyone is expecting of him -- in some ways the system more runs a president than a president runs the system. Barack Obama has however already made changes. He's demonstrated what optimism, sticking with the goals that you set and hard work can accomplish; especially in contrast to fear.

The bully-pulpit does affect our nation -- it affects our culture -- how hard people work, how afraid they are, how good they feel, when they make decisions to purchase things, what they think of other people and cultures. Many people feel pessimistic and/or apathetic regarding government because they feel they have no power over it or don't feel the affect it has on them. The tone set by the president isn't policy but does affect us personally.

Obama critics like to say that he's no different than Bush, that Obama will carry forth the same policies as Bush did. If you're looking at them from miles away, that may be true. I don't expect that Obama will be able to accomplish all that he's stated he will accomplish, but he's already accomplished change through his words; reminding us of our history, of what has made us strong and of the power of attitude, setting goals and working hard to accomplish them.
"Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends — hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism — these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility — a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task."
So adjust your attitude accordingly and set some goals -- regardless of what you think of Barack Obama you must admit that his story itself is inspiring -- how he set his goals, overcame big obstacles and worked hard to get the presidency. Getting involved doesn't mean you have to canvas for a environmental group or fax your senator or purchase goods and services from local independently-owned companies. Those are all good ideas, but simply making decisions that positively affect others or at least do not negatively impact them is a start.

Everyone is different obviously but you never know how you might be able to positively affect someone else's life. Sharon Dawson suggested I start this blog. Todd White and Cathy Nemeth thought it was a good idea, so here I am, writing it. Time will tell if has a positive affect on anyone else but I'm giving it a shot. I know that today I am inspired as a citizen of the United States to do SOMETHING and to acknowledge and celebrate the great things that we are as a nation.

And finally, keep paying attention. The Bush administration was doing counter-productive things long before the general public was paying much attention.

Congratulations America!

16 comments:

  1. OK, Mark!! I've bookmarked you and am sending the link onto others. Ellen K-L

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Mark for starting this. My goal for the First 100 Days is to read and contribute to this blog every day!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ok it is really great that we have made a major step forward from the past. Now lets get to work!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Adjusting attitudes is so much harder than doing something like working for a charity etc., but if one was listening with full heart and ears to todays speech, it should be a start..with the role model we have at the helm now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your first statement is that politicians lie but that you are going to take President Obama at his word. Why is it that you can so readily trust him when nobody really knows much about him? He was never vetted by the mainstream media and has given nothing but platitudes throughout his campaign, right up to and including today’s inauguration speech.

    We do know that he is extremely liberal (read socialist), has very little real political experience, and is surrounding himself with old Washington insiders, many of whom are shady characters at best. Controversy is also swirling around him in the “pay to play” scandal concerning his vacant senate seat. Yet MSNBC, CNN, NPR and all the rest of their ilk would have us believe that there is no reason to bother looking into President Obama’s past or questioning his possible involvement in any dirty dealings. Do you really think he is as squeaky clean as the media would have us believe? Be honest now. If he were a conservative would he have been able to ride such a wave of hypocrisy to the white house? The only answer is a resounding NO!

    Regarding the economy, President Obama has more or less “telegraphed” that major tax increases are imminent. I don’t have the exact quote, but we all heard him say last week that we are in for trillion dollar budget deficits for the foreseeable future. Yet Mr. Obama and Joe Biden have the gall to tell us we need to live responsibly and to do our patriotic duty by paying taxes!! Now you know very well that the government takes more than enough of our money. I maintain that the federal government needs to lead by example, make deep cuts in spending and implement fair taxation policies. They need to remember that they are not the social elite they believe themselves to be, but rather public servants.

    Regarding the war on terror, you interpret his words to mean that he will neither be soft on terror nor be an appeaser, but why then would he meet with Iran “without precondition?” To meet with them at all is to legitimize their efforts at destabilization in the middle East. To not have taken a position on the recent conflict in Gaza indicates to me that he thinks Israel is wrong for defending itself after months of rocket barrages, and will ultimately side with Hamas. How will he deal with al qaeda or the taliban?

    Finally, the comments I made earlier today on Face book were merely intended to “stir the pot” on inauguration day, but had their roots in the fact that the Democratic Party basically has unchecked power, which is a terribly dangerous situation regardless of which party has it. The entire federal government must be watched very closely over the next 4 years because of this fact, yet obamania almost ensures this won’t be the case. Isn’t that at least a little scary to anybody reading this? Remember, The Salvation of the State is Watchfulness in the Citizen.

    The bottom line is that it is impossible for me to have an attitude adjustment toward a man that I don’t trust. At this point only time will tell. I truly hope I’m wrong about the guy, but I’m not buying into the image that’s been portrayed to us. It is truly my hope that President Obama does what is right for all of us. Unfortunately, I don’t think that most of us could even agree on what that is.
    Thanks for the forum. I know that taking the unpopular view won't make me any friends here, but this is serious stuff and "feel good" politics just won't cut it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Your first statement is that politicians lie but that you are going to take President Obama at his word. Why is it that you can so readily trust him when nobody really knows much about him? He was never vetted by the mainstream media and has given nothing but platitudes throughout his campaign, right up to and including today’s inauguration speech."

    Mark: In a way I think this is a good point Mike. We probably shouldn't accept any politician at his word. One of my future blog posts is going to be about being able to criticize one's own party -- members of both parties often have a tough time criticizing anyone from their own party and instead say, "well look at how bad the other side is" -- I know. I've done it. I'll keep an open mind and be glad to offer constructive criticism. You are right -- there's no reason to take any politician at their word. That said, my current conjecture is that Obama will run a different "War on Terror" than Bush will. If he doesn't, I will be disappointed and will be the first in line to offer my constructive criticism on the matter. This blog isn't intended to be an homage to Obama.

    "We do know that he is extremely liberal (read socialist), has very little real political experience, and is surrounding himself with old
    Washington insiders, many of whom are shady characters at best. "

    Mark: I see him more of a pragmatic than as a liberal. Most liberals would have preferred to see him not surround himself with so Washington insiders. I like some of them more than others. With Bush and Reagan we saw how powerful the advisors of a president can become, so obviously we should keep an eye on the advisors, but again, I plan on offering my criticism constructively (Mid-term elections aren't for another two years)-- my belief as to why he has surrounded himself with who he has is as a signal to the fiscal elite to not worry too much about him. He has a lot of people he needs to please.

    "Controversy is also swirling around him in the “pay to play” scandal concerning his vacant senate seat. "

    Mark: Are not most or all politicians involved with power politics like this? The Illinois governor is a fool but Obama himeslf wasn't involved.
    Did you have the same level of magnifying glass on standards when Bush was in office?

    "Yet MSNBC, CNN, NPR and all the rest of their ilk would have us believe ....."

    Mark: I don't believe anyone is squeaky clean, no.

    "Regarding the economy, President Obama has more or less “telegraphed” that major tax increases are imminent. "

    Mark: I've seen this written by many conservatives though I don't see that but let's talk about taxes. The government needs money to function. It gets that money either via taxes or borrowing. Republicans borrow. Democrats tax. Either way you're spending power decreases. The real problem is what the government is spending money on and what it is accomplishing with that money. You " maintain that the federal government needs to lead by example, make deep cuts in spending and implement fair taxation policies. They need to remember that they are not the social elite they believe themselves to be, but rather public servants." and I agree with you whole-heartedly. Fiscal conservatism is what I missed the most from the republicans under Bush. Bush and now Obama, are both big government spenders -- the difference being that Bush spent the money on corrupt defense contractors that did not reduce terrorism or make us safe and Obama will be targeting the US infrastructure itself. By the way, I was against the bank bailouts. We can talk more about them if you'd like.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Regarding the war on terror, you interpret his words to mean that he will neither be soft on terror nor be an appeaser, but why then would he meet with Iran “without precondition"To meet with them at all is to legitimize their efforts at destabilization in the middle East. To not have taken a position on the recent conflict in Gaza indicates to me that he thinks Israel is wrong for defending itself after months of rocket barrages, and will ultimately side with Hamas. How will he deal with al qaeda or the taliban?"

    Mark: Nothing has recently empowered Iran more than our invasion and occupation of Iraq. There is nothing wrong with diplomacy as one of the cards you might play in your hand.

 The Taliban and Al Qaeda are a great topic of debate. I'm fine with military force here if it is targeted and well-defined, which Iraq was not.

    "Finally, the comments I made earlier today on Face book were merely intended to “stir the pot” on inauguration day, but had their roots in the fact that the Democratic Party basically has unchecked power, which is a terribly dangerous situation regardless of which party has it."

    Mark: We have indeed seen that with the republican party. Both parties have been supporting "Big Brother" legislation. We should all speak out against either party if this is important to us to stop.

"The bottom line is that it is impossible for me to have an attitude adjustment toward a man that I don’t trust."

    Mark: You don't need to. I'm asking that you have an attitude adjustment for yourself and your fellow citizen, not Barack Obama.

    "At this point only time will tell. I truly hope I’m wrong about the guy, but I’m not buying into the image that’s been portrayed to us. "

    Mark: I think he will disappoint many, but more likely from the left than from the right. I still think he's already making a good president -- we're having this discussion and sharing our views! A few months ago we might be yelling obscenities at each other by now.

    "It is truly my hope that President Obama does what is right for all of us."

    Mark: I absolutely agree. That is his job.

    "Unfortunately, I don’t think that most of us could even agree on what that is."

    Mark: I agree but if even a minor majority are catered to than we'll be making steps in the right direction.

    "Thanks for the forum. I know that taking the unpopular view won't make me any friends here, but this is serious stuff and "feel good" politics just won't cut it."

    Mark: You bet. Actually, it's a PERFECT segue into what I was thinking would be blog tomorrow or in the near future: Engaging discussion on controversial issues -- We've all been screaming at each other for too long.

    Cheers Mike! Thanks for your comments. Please keep them coming.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Response to Mike B

    Mikes words:
    Regarding the war on terror, you interpret his words to mean that he will neither be soft on terror nor be an appeaser, but why then would he meet with Iran “without precondition?” To meet with them at all is to legitimize their efforts at destabilization in the middle East. To not have taken a position on the recent conflict in Gaza indicates to me that he thinks Israel is wrong for defending itself after months of rocket barrages, and will ultimately side with Hamas. How will he deal with al qaeda or the taliban?

    Response from Erich:

    You show concern that Obama would talk to Iran or any other country that wants to destablize the middle east. What are the alternatives. Well, we have told the world that we will not play nicely with Iran and the like. And if you think about the school yard bullies back when you were a kid, yes sometimes if you confront bullies with bullying tactics, they will back off, but many bullies want confrontation. If we react to everything that Iran type nations do with bullying tactics, do you think the rest of those types of countries will like the United States very much for that? How many wars, how many men and women do you want to see die? Believe it or not Mr Mike in many facets of life, those who are willing to talk things out tend to be able to get what the want a lot more then by fighting. To me, anyone who is afraid of Obama talking things out with other nations just wants what George Bush wanted. War with everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  9. After 8 long years of being so against so many things that came out of our federal government, I'm personally very excited to be for something and someone for a while. I'm sure that his honeymoon won't last too long, but I for one am going to give him a real healthy benefit of the doubt for quite a while.

    I will sleep better tonight knowing that a community organizer and constitutional scholar who is not much older than me is sitting in the driver's seat. It also doesn't hurt that he has already asked us all to do a little more than go shopping to show our patriotism. GoBama!

    ReplyDelete
  10. In response to Uncle Erich

    Unfortunately, ours is a world governed by war where the victor determines the terms of the peace. That is a reality. You cannot wish that away. Of course I’d rather that there were a peaceful resolution to all conflict, but it just doesn’t work that way. You essentially want President Obama to have tea with somebody who would rather kill you, me, my kids and all the rest of us, without laying down any ground rules, expectations or consequences. Do you really think there is any way to negotiate with somebody like that? He is of the same manner as those who sawed Daniel Pearl’s head off and video taped it for the whole world to see. Was that just a cry for help??!!! Do you think that if President Obama asks Ahmadinejad really, really nicely that he’ll change his mind about wanting to annihilate Israel with nuclear weapons? Even if he told you what you wanted to hear, do you think we could trust him? Give me a break.

    I’m not “afraid” of Obama “talking things out,” its just that the statement of meeting Ahmadinejad without precondition reveals him to be just another average politician. The statement was either borne out of ignorance of how the world really works, or out of political expediency in order to get elected. We all know the man is intelligent, so it’s probably not the former. Rather, he knew that he had to placate the peaceniks to get their vote. He knew if he continued to tow the line he would lose some support. So all of this goes back to the first statement of my original post. To reiterate, can you really trust him to do what he says he will do? Again, the answer is “no.”

    As for you Uncle Erich, I admire your peaceful ideals, but urge you to realize that it’s a big bad world out there. Playground analogies probably don’t hold up very well when we’re talking about a mix of religious fanaticism and nuclear weapons and how to deal with that threat.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mr Mike:

    And when you think of past empires such as the Roman empire, what happens to them eventually. For various reasons each empire ends up having countries from many different places wanting to fight war with them. And each time this has happened, the empires fall. You cannot fight everybody. The Roman Empire did, and it eventually fell. Why do we, and you Mr Mike always fall victim to history? Maybe we can go against the grain. Attempt peaceful means at first and then if that doesn't work we can try other things before we trade in our children's lives for peace. It is like my dad taught me when I was a child and getting into fights, or playing sports. There is always going to be someone out there that is bigger or better then you. You cannot win every war.

    In closing, I would like to state, I think the United States biggest mistake was shown to the world on 9/11. We are not protecting our shores very well. Lets protect our land, our shores, and people who pay taxes so that we can have this great nation. Lets work on alternative energy sources so that we have no need to stick our nose in the middle east. That is not our land, this. This Land is your land this land is my land and so on and so forth.

    Remember what Obama has said about Israel. If someone sends rockets into your back yard, you have the right to fight back. If someone pisses in our back yard then we should pounce. Something that the Bush administration failed to do since 9/11.

    Oh and one final point about bullies and nasty nations. Everyone always wants to fight the guy that thinks he is the toughest guy on the playground. If we keep fighting everyone, I mean go to war with everyone, the bullies are going to like this and take this as an invite to take us down. Is this what we want for our kids?

    ReplyDelete
  12. To Mike, re: "Unfortunately, ours is a world governed by war where the victor determines the terms of the peace. ":

    Nothing has empowered Iran recently more than our occupation of Iraq. If removing the Taliban and limiting Iran's power is part of what defines victory for us than we have lost miserably.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It is inevitable that we, a country that has been the number one empire in the world since World War II will have many evil nations wanting to go to war with us using various means.

    We need a strategy. Our strategy should be to start rebuilding our nation within. This starts with securing our boarders, and this does not mean physically, this means know your enemy. You will not learn all that you need to know about your enemy if you fight with him in battle. It is better to talk with your enemy, to talk with your enemies, enemies. You need to know your enemy so that you will know what part of your borders to secure and what part of our nation might be in jeopardy incase of some type of attack. Again knowing your enemy is the key. Tell me how we can learn from other countries if we continue to flex our muscles in their face. They will not open up and let us in. They will let us in, if we offer them a nice cup of Maxwell House and a talk.

    Another way to keep our nation secure is to find alternative fuels, so we can be self dependent.

    Education needs to be as important as anything. When I said secure our boarders not only physically I was meaning think about technology. Once we were a nation full of smart men and women, scientists and scholars and we can be that again. We need to look at ways to make education most important in everyone’s lives. We need to pay teachers more, and pay the great ones even more. In this country we pay Doctors a lot of money because we value life and our health. It is great to be alive and have a life to life but you need to use your life for something good. Getting an available, affordable education is a great way to help you find how to best live your life.


    We need a better more secure financial sector. We need jobs, and good safe homes to come home to. If you want a good safe home land, then you have to have a country worth fighting for.

    You need to continue to build a strong and smart Military.

    If you want a safe and strong nation, so as to frighten other nations away from attacking us, you must insist that all Americans put aside their differences and learn to get along with their neighbors. If we continue to not like thy neighbor because of skin color, race, sex, gender, sexual orientation or religion, we are only dividing our nation into bits and pieces. Tell me how can we be a strong enough team like nation to fend off other nations if we can’t love the people within our nation?

    Gosh Mr. Mike, I had to stop here, I was going to keep describing what we need to do, but then I remembered Obama is on the job. I know I don’t need to tell him how to do what I have just spoken about. Funny these words came from my mind and my mouth, but something tells me Obama could have written this very blog himself. Like I said before, instead of not supporting him from day one, or day two on the job, lets give him, our neighbor, a chance to make things right. Let’s at least give him our backing. If he supports us and we support him, then I think we will have made a great team and a chance at great cup of coffee…

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mark & Uncle Erich,

    First of all, let me reiterate: Unfortunately, ours is a world governed by war where the victor determines the terms of the peace. That is a reality. You cannot wish that away.

    I did not make the “rules,” I’m not happy about them nor am I the one who determined the metrics by which success is determined. That’s simply the way it is and the way it’s always been. Having a power lunch with people who adhere to those “rules,” who are hell bent on the total destruction of another country isn’t going to change anything. Again, I am not happy about it. I wish things were different. I’m not a hawk, I don’t want war with Iran or any other country. OK? I don’t think I can state it any clearer.

    Uncle Erich, I agree with you 100% on securing our borders, on developing alternative fuels, a sound economy, the importance of a good education for all and the necessity of a powerful military. So, we don’t really need to argue any of these points any further.

    My original post was not about any of the above issues specifically. A lengthy conversation about US policy in the Middle East was not my intent. Rather, I was advancing the fact that President Obama is a mere politician, and politicians lie. Right Mark? However, it has become increasingly evident since winning the Democratic Party nomination that many, even most, Obama voters are so emotionally invested in the IMAGE of the new president that they refuse to even consider the idea that he’s not all he’s cracked up to be. Nobody could be all that! I emphasized the word “image” because the mainstream media never attempted to vet Mr. Obama, and therefore none of us really know who this guy is or what he is about. All we have is this image that the media has forced down our collective throats. Mark, its like bad radio stations playing bad pop music and convincing a gullible public that they actually like that crap! You know exactly what I’m talking about! The obamaniacs are so enamored with the man, that they implicitly trust the politician and aren’t even willing to consider for one second that this might all be a sham perpetrated to get one person elected. We should always be wary of politicians regardless of party affiliation, ESPECIALLY the ones who are telling us exactly what we want to hear. They’re probably lying. One last time: The Salvation of the State is Watchfulness in the Citizen.

    I think we all ultimately want the same thing. However, unlike the obamaniacs I am not willing to blindly follow any person I know little or nothing about, especially a politician.

    Mark, regarding your question as to whether I was this critical of President Bush and his administration, the answer is yes. I disagreed with many positions and policies through the years, but they (Bush and his administration) were more or less a known quantity. I knew what to expect from President Bush, but I also knew that the mainstream media was more than willing to distort things and open to publishing outright lies (eg Dan Rather). They have no journalistic integrity nor any credibility whatsoever. I have no idea what to expect from President Obama. If you are correct in your assumption that he has the courage to be a pragmatist, then I suspect I will be pleasantly surprised. But I’m not about to give him the benefit of the doubt and turn a blind eye to the politics of the federal government.

    I am going to refrain from blogging for a few weeks so that I can see what our new President accomplishes in that time and to try to get a sense of how he is going to operate. Please respond to this post – I’m not trying to make enemies here. I am gravely concerned that our citizenry has lost its objectivity. And rest assured, I will watch President Obama with interest, with skepticism and yes, even hope. Hope that he makes courageous decisions with the best interests of our country at heart, rather than to push a far left agenda down our throats like a Debbie Gibson tune.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi Mike -- thanks to both of you and Erich for the dialogue here -- much appreciated! You said that you are going to refrain from blogging for a few weeks but I do hope that you'll come back and contribute to the other blog entries. Most of them will have nothing to do with Obama specifically.

    I'm fully aware that a lot of people think that Obama-supporters are overly-enthusiastic and blind and while I do think there's a lot of enthusiasm for him and I do think as I've said that progressives and ideologues will likely be disappointed by him at some point, most of the Obama supporters that I know are also aware of this. It is fair however that Bush and Obama be viewed with the same level of scrutiny. Bush got a free pass for years.

    ReplyDelete
  16. By the way I am still sour about Hillary not becoming the first woman president in 2009...

    ReplyDelete